Syria: To Strike or Not to Strike

Yes, I do believe, unlike some of conservative media personalities, that the United States should strike. But, there is one major caveat for me if we do. The United States must not strike without a definitive plan and mission in place that's honestly communicated to the American people on a level that won't jeopardize the mission.

Now more than ever, Americans need to to know why we should strike and send our soldiers in harms way. The President needs to share his mission expectations without press secretary hyperbole and innuendo.

Will we embolden the wrong coalitions if we strike? How many embassy workers are at risk? Who really benefit from the strike? Will it be the Muslim Brotherhood, al Qaeda, both, or the democratic, freedom loving Syrians who want to see their country modernize and progress.

While I have weighed this debate over and over in my mind, even at one time supporting the idea of not striking, the recent videos and photos of dead, bagged children and young Syrians lying side by side on death row has convinced me that all civilized, peace-loving nations who can, must get involved to remove Assad and his deadly regime immediately.

What truly frustrates me is how politically calculated President Obama and his trusty advisors have been on the Syrian issue (not to mention other issues: IRS, NSA, Benghazi, and the list goes on). In recent days, I have heard: we must strike...no we will wait on Congress (so I can blame GOP in Congress if my Syrian proposal fails)...we are not sure of the outcome [but hey, what difference does it make now - sound familiar?].  

Look, while no one is saying it out loud (well, maybe a few are), I feel confident the Benghazi debacle was and remains connected to Syria. It's kind of a duh?! Oh, if Americans would only embrace the facts with open eyes, hearts and minds. 

Obama needs to put a viable Syrian "use of force" proposal in front of the military, Congress and U.S. allies — a proposal the civilized world can get behind and support. It must include a definitive endgame, the mission must be clear and Obama must get Americans behind him, even those who don't inherently trust him like me.

The United States is a noble country, albeit seemingly morally and ethically devoid right now, and always has been despite the past and present bad citizens and politicians who have shaped history for the worse. If we go into Syria, we must triumph, there is no other choice.

I listened yesterday to the guest host on the Glenn Beck radio show. He was right, we can't let ourselves get fatigued. It's important to get out and enjoy family, friends and local surrounding and stay fresh and vigilant. While it is critical that we all stay engaged in this battle because our freedom and liberties are at stake, it's essential to stay lucid.

It is true, this fight against terrorism and radical Islam is thoroughly exhausting and at times feels hopeless. Our children are the light and hope, and should always remain the reason that we as a nation and individuals never give up the noble fight that is for and has always been about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

MUST WATCH: The Hope & The Change

In a continuing effort to expose President Barack Obama for the negative impact his policies have had on this country and its economy, The Hope & The Change is a must watch film. The documentary sums up the sentiment of many of today's Independent and Democrat voters who feel cheated and have decided to look beyond party lines and vote for real and positive change on Nov. 6.

I encourage anyone with the time and inclination to watch this documentary before making a final decision.

And, after watching if you decide you want to help drive the economy UPWARD make sure to visit the EUG Store and buy an EUG mug before the next debate!

Heck, like SNL Obama daydreamed during the debate skit: "Everyone LOVES coffee, right?!"

So many questions, so little time

If you've got constructive answers, feel free to comment.

Why would a terrorist group need the cover of a video to commit an act of terror? Is not an act of terror by definition that which cannot easily be thwarted in advance? That's what makes it terrifying.

Why is Obama et. al. so quick to blame the 14 minute video clip without question, yet hesitant to state what most people knew from the moment they first heard about it?

Like I have heard on the Five (good show by the way), who first proposed the notion of a Youtube video being the source for any and all rancor across the greater middle east. Why is this person not on television?

Why are we not angry here in the US at the mutilation of American citizens on American property and the raising of AQ Black flags in at least four American consulates? Also are these not acts of war?

When will we acknowledge the fact that Iran and its allies are on a course to wage all out war on Israel first, then on all the West?

Why do we allow the likes of Iran's leader to appear here on American soil at the UN. Do we not have any say as to who can come and go within our sovereign territory?

Can the UN be moved to some other country? I'm offended by the presence of that institution on American soil as long as it treats ruthless dictators on the same level as heads of state in good standing.

Why are Christians not as angry and offended about a crucifix suspended in a vat of urine on display in a public museum as the Muslims appear to be with regard to their religious symbols?

Why are we giving away cell phones to minorities in inner cities? I never heard of this until I heard from the rather enthused Obama supporter out of Cleveland.

Why is it not ok to state the fact that 47% or so of the populace of this country are in one way or another dependent on the federal government for their livelihood?

Will Romney come alive in the debates, like Reagan did against Carter? I hope so. He needs a "Well, there you go again." moment.

 

 

When federal officials opine in front of a mic, like Hillary Clinton, how come they only seem to regurgitate facts that we already know. Telling us over again what we already know takes up the allotted airtime and makes these people seem knowledgeable, but you may notice that they never really say anything.

~JH